Update: Katherine Jackson Given Temporary Custody of MJ’s Kids.

Posted on June 29th, 2009 - By Bossip Staff

Categories: Babies, Baby Mama Drama, For the Children, Fu*kin for Tracks, Ho Sit Down, News, On the Come up

deborah rowe

We just received word that Katherine Jackson has been given legal guardianship status of Jackson’s three children. Round 1 goes to the Jackson family.

Pop the top for more

Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson’s mother, has been granted temporary guardianship of Michael’s three kids.

A hearing is set for next Monday on the matter.

Source

You all knew this was going to get uglier than it already is, didn’t you? Deborah Rowe is trying to take the meal tickets/kids away from the Jackson family.

Michael Jackson’s mother, Katherine, is taking care of the singer’s three children and the family will go to court…… Monday in part to protect her rights to custody, the family’s spokesman said Monday. Londell McMillan, the Jacksons’ attorney, said the family hasn’t heard from Deborah Rowe, the mother of Jackson’s two oldest children, about custody. “I don’t think there will be anybody who thinks that there is someone better” than Katherine Jackson to have custody, McMillan said on NBC’s “Today” show. “She is a very loving host of other grandchildren.”

Jackson left behind three children: Michael Joseph Jackson Jr., known as Prince Michael, 12; Paris Michael Katherine Jackson, 11; and Prince Michael II, 7. The youngest son was born to a surrogate mother.Given the secrecy surrounding Michael Jackson’s children throughout his life, it’s no surprise that there are lingering questions about who will care for them after his death. What is almost certain is this: Their fate will be decided in a courtroom. Experts say the person who has the strongest legal claim to Jackson’s two oldest children is Rowe. As for the youngest child, Jackson’s wishes will be more influential. It remains unclear who Jackson designated as potential guardians for his children. Those details — likely contained in the 50-year-old singer’s will — have not been released.

Rowe’s attorney, Marta Almli, wrote in a statement Saturday that “Ms. Rowe’s only thoughts at this time have been regarding the devastating loss Michael’s family has suffered. Ms. Rowe requests that Michael’s family, and particularly the children, be spared such harmful, sensationalist speculation and that they be able to say goodbye to their loved one in peace.”

Jackson never told his family who he had in place to handle his business affairs, a person close to the family told The Associated Press on Friday. The person, who requested anonymity because of the delicate nature of the situation, said they were told by the singer’s phalanx of advisers that he likely had a will, but it may be many years old. Prince Michael II’s mother has never been identified, and while she may surface, it is likely that she signed away her rights, said Stacy Phillips, a Los Angeles divorce attorney who has represented numerous high-profile clients.

Jackson was by several accounts an attentive and loving father. “He was a great father,” said Raymone Bain, Jackson’s former publicist and general manager. “Those kids knew three and four languages. Even the little one. They were well mannered and sweet. I can’t imagine these children without him.” He was extremely protective of his children, who weren’t often seen in public, and were photographed wearing veils, masks or other items covering their faces when they were.

Rowe, a former nurse for Jackson’s dermatologist, married Jackson in 1996 but filed for divorce in 1999. She later gave up her custody rights to the children, but petitioned to have those rights restored in 2003 after Jackson was arrested on child molestation charges, and an appeals court sided with her. Jackson and Rowe apparently agreed in 2006 regarding her rights, but the terms have never been disclosed. The couple’s divorce case that was heard in Los Angeles Superior Court remains closed. Phillips said if her parental rights remain intact, she’s presumed to be first in line to receive custody of her two children. “That could still be contested,” she added. Rowe would have to undergo an evaluation by the court to determine if she’s the best person to care for Jackson’s children. So, too, would anyone else who applies to become the children’s guardian — some of whom may have Jackson’s blessing. “If he did indicate a preference, that will be given great weight, but that will not be determinative,” said Los Angeles attorney Gloria Allred. “Children are not property, they cannot be willed to another person.”

Allred agreed that Rowe has better legal standing than others who apply for custody of Jackson’s eldest children. “She’s definitely going to have an advantage.” But judges in California often take into account who is left in the children’s lives with a strong bond, said Charlotte Goldberg, a family law professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. “It’s really a balance between continuity and stability and a biological relationship,” Goldberg said. A judge deciding the matter may even seek input in chambers from Jackson’s children about who they feel comfortable with, she said. But a court will also take into account with whom the children have a relationship bond, and that may not work in Rowe’s favor. She wrote in a 2001 petition to sever her parental rights that she thought Jackson was doing a good parenting job.

“Michael has been a wonderful father to the children, and I do not wish to share any parenting responsibilities with Michael because he is doing so well without me,” Rowe wrote. She also indicated in court filings during the 2006 custody struggle that she had not seen the children since 2005, shortly after his trial ended in acquittal on all charges and Jackson moved the children overseas. It is unclear how often Rowe has seen the children since Jackson returned to the Los Angeles area in recent months to prepare for a 50-show concert engagement in London. It is also unclear what role the children’s godfather, British child actor Mark Lester, may play in the proceedings. Whoever wins custody of Jackson’s children won’t automatically gain control of their inheritance, Phillips said. “For many people, the person or persons who are taking care of their kids are not necessarily taking care of their money,” Phillips said. “There’s a benefit to that — a sort of a check-and-balance.” Rowe, or whoever is designated the children’s guardian, will receive payments based on Jackson’s estate, Phillips said.

More clarity about the fate of Jackson’s children will likely come once court proceedings start. Phillips said the custody issue will now be handled by a probate court. If it is filed at Los Angeles’ main downtown courthouse, Phillips said it will be handled by judges with significant family law experience. Phillips said the looming custody fight could be unlike any other. “In all the cases I’ve read all over the country,” she said, “I’ve never seen a fact pattern like this.”

This goose needs to take what she has and fall back. Michael already payed her for her services and put her white @ss up in a house for poppin’ out two of his three test tube babies. These gold diggers just don’t know when to quit. SMH

Source

  • whoozdat

    ..

  • whoozdat

    Katherine should definately raise these children

  • K.C.

    He’s not even in the ground yet and ppl are clownin

  • 360

    What is her nationality, caucasian and cow? LOL!

  • http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/Site%20Index.htm We “Blacks” Are The REAL Hebrew Israelites

    What an unfortunate looking woman.

  • I go deep yes you fill it in ya stomach just relax

    Bottom line the Jacksons got money and in the end money will win and they will have the children because they can provide a better living for the children .

  • WOO!

    @360,

    That’s funny!

  • CAT EYES

    How dare this woman come forth to try to get those children,She’s the same one who signed them over for money.She’s a sorry excuse for a woman.I heartd MJ had a will and wanted the nanny to have the children so I hope it goes that way.

  • The Bear-

    The bottom line is that as their mother if she wants the kids she will get them because it has never been alleged or proven that she is an unfit mother.

  • Hannibal

    Wait…so that’s not Hulk Hogan?

  • Resurrected

    MJ Should have left a Will and this would not be a problem… I read a statement form the mother saying that she does not want the kids and never had a motherly connection with them in the first place, but Katherine is older now and she may not be around long either so they need to have a plan B for these children…

  • Resurrected

    Well a lot of the Jackson Family Mixed kids looked more white then black… Remember Tedo Kids 3T when they came out the looked more white then black as well…MJ just wanted kids he did not care about the color of them…

  • ME 2

    I loved Mike just like anyone else that gew up on the 70′s/80′s/90′s…(lol), however, I cannot honestly say that those kids are his. Although you can alter the color of your skin, hair, nose, nails, lips, etc., DNA doesnt lie, give the woman her kids.

  • http://bossip.com This some shhhh…

    No will, and no termination of rights from the mother, means she is almost guaranteed custody of the 2 kids. The youngest, no one knows who the mother is.

  • sepia830

    Definitely not Debbie Rowe. BUT I don’t think Katherine Jackson should raise them either. She is really up in age and Joe Jackson would be exposed to those kids on a daily basis. He would have them forming a rock band the day after MJ’s funeral. I think Reebie has always come across as stable. If she would be willing, I think she should raise the kids. But then again I don’t know these people personally. Hopefully MJ had a will and someone in mind (and I’m pretty sure it wasn’t Debbie Rowe’s money-hungry ass).

  • Simply Lovely

    @ ME 2 – WTF do you mean give the woman her kids. Did ya miss the part where she SIGNED them over to MJ and SEVERED her parental rights? WTF? Shoot, I can see if you needed a break but severing your parental rights? Um, no! I’m a mom and I’d never do some shyt like that to my children. She clearly doesn’t want these children.

  • brnhornet

    For the record she did not give up her parental right. She deffered to let Michael raise them as opposed to her. Mabye she thought he was a better parent than her.

    However now that Michael is dead she has every right to reclaim her children. She trusted him to raise them not his mother. Unless she has abused them in some way there is no court in the world that will not give her custody. And I happen to agree.

  • ME 2

    @ sepia830
    Thanks for “correcting” me, I would love to just be able to state my opinion, and let everyone else state theirs, I can respect that……I can read other peoples comments and although I dont agree with them all, I can respect that they have a mind of their own, so, please, respect mine.

    @ Simply Lovely
    Kudos to you for being a good mother and doing the right thing, I wish there were more like you in the world, however, everyone isnt cut from the same cloth, and once again, you are entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine, I can respect yours and every one elses on here because I realize that people are individuals and we dont all have to think alike…….if I can respect you, please do so for me, thats all I am saying.

  • ME 2

    And just because Michael was raising them doesnt mean that his parents should get them, because we all know what kind of father Joe was……

  • interesting

    was mj close with his mother and father? i thought mj barely spoke with his parents or with his siblings. I bet mj was probably closer with his nanny and people who worked for him. I feel bad for those kids, i think the kids are old enough to decide WHO they want to live with.

  • ME 2

    @ brnhornet
    My thoughts exactly, and I have said before, I will ALWAYS be a huge fan of Mikes, had the jacket and all (lol), but its amazing how when tragedy strikes, people tend to forget things, and all they want to remember is the good….Joe wasnt your ideal loving father and Katherine stood by and let a whole lot of things happen, and thats the truth but for some reason people tend to get selective memory at times like these.

  • L

    She did give them up….correct?

  • be

    Just goes to show she is only thinking of herself. MJ has not even been buried and she is thinking of causing the kids more drama..smh

  • hope4more

    Can anyone tell me if Katherine and Joe are still married? I thought that she kicked him out a while back and didn’t Janet buy him a house in Las Vegas?

  • Divine

    @hope4more

    Can anyone tell me if Katherine and Joe are still married? I thought that she kicked him out a while back and didn’t Janet buy him a house in Las Vegas?
    ————————————————————-
    According to CNN, Michael was talking about how he all the brothers and sisters and the entire family was in Vegas recently celebrating their 60th Wedding Anniversary. I thought they weren’t together. But apparently they are.

  • UNKNOWN

    I WISH HIS KIDS ALL THE BEST I HOPE WHO EVER GETS CUSTODY TREAT THEM WELL.

  • ME 2

    @ Slide Like A Fresh Pair of Gators
    I agree 100%, I tried to make that statement, and the dawgs came after me…(lol), but I feel you. But you know how people are, when tragedy strikes, they want to become all holier than thou…..knowing full damn well Katherine and Joe doesnt need to take care of anymore children, look what they did to their own!

  • CAT EYES

    To be honest,I think the children should go to the nanny because she is the only one besides MJ they were ever with.Children need stability and they have to know they are wanted and Debbie cannot provide either one of those things since she sold them in exchange for money in the first place.Joe shouldn’t even be able to feed someone’s dog let alone children.

  • Sugar&Salt

    @ Cat Eyes
    I was thinking the exact same thing. I also hope that Mrs Jackson will hire the nanny on so that the children will continue to have her in their lives while they go through this terrible time.

  • electrikblue

    Why did they put that old picture up! she doesnt look like that anymore.

  • http://www.myspace.com/ocky_j Octavia

    @ ME 2

    I loved Mike just like anyone else that gew up on the 70’s/80’s/90’s…(lol), however, I cannot honestly say that those kids are his. Although you can alter the color of your skin, hair, nose, nails, lips, etc., DNA doesnt lie, give the woman her kids.
    ________________________________________________

    HER kids?! She sold them. I don’t care if they don’t share blood, those kids are Jacksons cause that’s who looked out for them. Why the hell would she suddenly want them? ($$$)

  • black gold

    LMAO!

  • Sim1

    If you read closely it clearly states that she has NOT made any attempt to get the kids, so everyone calm down. The media is bringing this up to make more scandal and sensationalize the death of MJ and every little piece of anything they can think of.

  • Liyah

    “Michael already payed her for her services and put her white @ss up in a house for poppin’ out two of his three test tube babies.”

    Now that was uncalled for.

  • Curious

    This is a total lie! Why would you post this? His mother has temp custody of those children!

  • leave-it-be

    ++++++++++++++ first;;;; NONE OF THE JACKSON CLAN SHOULD RAISE THOSE KIDS!!! THEY ALL ARE EFFED UP!!!!THE MAMA IS 79 YRS. OLD, WHAT HAPPENS IN A FEW YRS. IF SHE DIES??? PLUS SHE DIDNT DO A GOOD JOB AT PROTECTING HER OWN KIDS FROM THAT ABUSIVE FATHEROF THEIRS SO WHAT COURT IS GONA WANT HIM TO HAVE CUSTODY OF THOSE KIDS???? MIKE IS TURNING OVER RIGHT NOW CAUSE EVERYONE KNOWS HE DETESTED HIS FATHER!!!!IT’S JUST ASHAME THAT EVERONE SAW WHEN MIKE WAS ALIVE THAT HE WAS NEVER EVER PHOTOGRAPHED WITH HIS KIDS AND HIS PARENTS!!!! HIS FATHER WASNT EVER SEEN AT HIS SHOWS WHEN HE PERFORMED ;BUT NOW HE’S ALL OVER TV!! THIS SICKENS ME….. MIKE I HOPE HAD THE GOOD SENSE TO MAKE PROVISIONS FOR GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS KIDS AND BUSINESS DEALINGS ESPECIALLY IF HE KNEW HIS HEALTH WAS FAILING HIM!!! THERE’S NO WAY A MAN BUYS COPYRIGHTS OF HIS SONGS AND GET THE BEATLES COLLECTION MAKING THOSE TYPE OF INVESTMENTS AND NOT HAVE A WILL!!!! SEEMS LIKE ALOTA PEOPLE TRYNA CAPITALIZE OFF HIS DEATH AND I’M SURE WHEN ALL THINGS ARE FINALLY ON THE TABLE…. MIKE GONA SHOCK THEM ALL WITH HIS FINAL PROVISIONS! R.I.P.MICHAEL :)

  • jfhdfjdshfdsjhkshf

    those kids don’t look mixed and Michael Jackson is dark skin he cant be the biological father.

  • Ninalicious

    The children certainly could he Michael’s. I’m tired of everyone saying they don’t look like him. If they’re bi-racial, they wouldn’t completely have his characteristics.

    I have a lot of mixed race people in my family. We are African-American. Some have the same skin tone as Michael’s daughter, Paris. I do not doubt at all that all three children have Michael Jackson’s DNA.

  • Ninalicious

    – To Jason B. Real —

    That statement is silly. Michael’s problem’s haven’t shortened his parents’ lifespans. Say what?!?

    Michael’s mother is 79 years old. She and Joe are still here, even though their son isn’t. They come from a different era, where you had to have tough skin. Understandably, they will never get over what has happened to their child — but they will make it through!

  • Ian P

    That does not mean nothing all they have to do is order a DNA test then the show is over for the Jacksons and everyone knows it…………

  • Ian P

    How can this woman be a gold digger when she married the fool? She is not a looker and she was a freaking nurse I am sure she was not hard up for money. Like or not those are her kids of course Michael wanted total control cause he is rich. I think those kids need their mother point blank….

  • Romayl

    why is everybody coming down so hard on joe and katharine? those kids got whipped like a lot of other kids who grew up in that era. the only difference is the jacksons are famous. besides, you don’t hear any of their many other grandchildren talking about joe beat them, so what would make him suddenly snap and start beating the hell out these 3? come on people, put your thinking caps on

    i dont think katharine should get them, simply because she is up in age. one of michaels siblings would be better equipped to handle them i think. as far as the woman is concerned…kick rocks!

  • http://undressingher.com undressingHER

    smh @ MJ for marrying that woman.

  • http://fawker.us/2009/06/30/mj-leaves-pops-out-of-the-will/ MJ Leaves Pops Out of the Will |

    [...] Jackson is the main reason Michael’s life was so tragic. The fact that he left his father out of the will comes as no surprise since Joe [...]

  • http://bossip.com BIGSHELLZ

    DAMN, HER BOOTS LOOK LIKE BURNT LOAVES OF BREAD! MICHAEL WOULD NEVER USE THIS CAVEWOMAN’S DNA TO SIRE HIS CHILDREN.

  • http://fawker.us/2009/06/30/michael-jackson-leaves-father-out-of-the-will/ Michael Jackson Leaves Father Out of the Will |

    [...] Jackson is the main reason Michael’s life was so tragic. The fact that he left his father out of the will comes as no surprise since Joe [...]

  • deesac

    Well I hope for the best for the kids which turns out that MJ is not the father of these kids. But this is gonna be a finacial nite mare for the Jacksons family. I hate to say it but thats how it turns out when you let white folks in black people business. He should of paid a sista to have his kids and he could of got it the ole natuarl way at that

  • Renee

    Its good Ms katherine got them. Debbie doesnt need them. She didnt want them then, she certaintly doesnt nned them now. They need her either. They actually have a relationship with their grandma. And regaurdless if Mj is their Biological dad, he raised them and they loved him just as much as he loved them, and no doubt he loved them more like he always says. And joe doesnt even live in the same state as ms katherine.so i dnt get why some of these ppl talk before they kno their facts. i hope everyhting works out in Ms katherine and the kids favor. God bless em.RIP MJ

  • Renee

    Its good Ms katherine got them. Debbie doesnt need them. She didnt want them then, she certaintly doesnt nned them now. They need her either. They actually have a relationship with their grandma. And regaurdless if Mj is their Biological dad, he raised them and they loved him just as much as he loved them, and no doubt he loved them more like he always says. And joe doesnt even live in the same state as ms katherine.so i dnt get why some of these ppl talk before they kno their facts.he even sayd hes not gna b involved witht he raising of the children. i hope everything works out in Ms katherine and the kids favor. God bless em.RIP MJ

blog comments powered by Disqus