Show Me The MuhFuggin Money!!! Wife Wins $9 Mill In Damages From Hubby’s Ho

- By Bossip Staff Categories: Caught Creepin', Hoes, Lawsuits

They say ain’t no fury like a woman scorned, but who needs fury when you can take it to the jury instead? A North Carolina woman sued her husband’s mistress for $9 million dollars worth of “severe emotional distress” and she won. Details on the flippy.

Cynthia Shackelford, 60, used a little-known law in her native state of North Carolina to bring a suit against Anne Lundquist, the lover whom she claims wrecked her 33-year marriage to husband Allan.

Lundquist was charged with “alienation of affections” – or interfering in a marriage – in one of the few American states that allow someone to sue over such a clause.

She was ordered to pay the $9 million in damages to Shackelford by a court in Greensboro, N.C., last week.

“I had not a clue that Allan would wander,” Shackelford told local newspaper the Greensboro News & Record. “He kept telling me ‘Oh, she’s just a friend. There’s no affair. I love you.’”

The spurned spouse, who gave up her teaching career to look after her former husband and their two children, said she hoped the ruling would deter other would-be mistresses of married men.

“We would like for people to respect the sanctity of marriage,” Shackelford said.

“We wanted a number high enough that it would keep other people from … going after other married spouses.”

This is the same law that folks were saying Fantasia better watch her back about… Too bad Sandra Bullock and Elin Woods aren’t North Carolina residents, even if it didn’t prevent them from opening their legs it might have kept those skanks from running their mouths.

Do you think this law should be enacted in more states? But do you think it would it prevent adultery or just create more lawsuits?

Source

Comments

  • TheOriginalBlkBarbie

    Ok so…WHY WAS THE HUSBAND NOT SUED AS WELL?

    He was the one lying to her about their relationship. Am I missing something? Do tell.

  • lovely1

    I wish they had this in New Orleans.. We’d all be paid

  • I'll Aways Be...

    Jump-offs, flash broads, and side pieces should be punished for their hoe-like behavior

  • peaches

    Why not sue the husband too. He’s the one that was married and kept lying to her. When will there be legal actions taken against a husband and wife that cheats? They are the ones who took those vows. Always wannan blame the outside person. The married spouse is the skank cause they are cheating on 2 people.

  • Don't ask if you don't wanna hear the TRUTH

    Okay…should’nt her husband be the one to pay. I mean after all, he is the one who chose to take a mistress. Hell that lady did’nt do a D.A.M.N thing wrong. Are you serious married men keep the bills paid, spice in the bedroom and in a new car lease.

    Who want to reap the benefits from an already ruined marriage. She (the mistress) saw it as an opportunity no to work so hard.

    Don’t worry mistress, ON TO THE NEXT ONE!!!!LOL

  • bklynsis

    this would definitely keep them husband-stealing- ho’s at bay…my mom is going thru it wit my dad..they been married for 30 yrs…and the ho knows my dad is married…i wonder if this applies in NY??…hmmmm

  • lt

    wow! I wonder what the ex-husband has to pay.

  • Ms Lady V

    She shouldn’t of got paid a dime.Her husband did it to her why do women always somehow forget the man.The mistress wasn’t married to her.

  • Mock Rock Star

    I think there will be more law-suits if this law was in other states. These are the states where this law exist if anyone is interested: Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah

  • beeTHATgirl

    I’m happy for the wife!
    Marriage just doesn’t mean the same as it use to to some people *smh* but hey 9million dollars, good for her!

  • kalifa.williams@yahoo.co.uk

    sue the cheater as well not just his hoe…..

  • chocalatetunda

    THATS RIGHT I WOULD HAVE SUED THAT HO TO. WHY NOT. AND FOR THE RECORD WHEN I LESVE HIS CHEATING AZZ IMMA TAKE HIM FOR ALL HE GOT ALSO. WHEN A MEN TELLS YOU HE MARRIED WHY WILL YOU STILL PERSUE HIM, BOTH OF YOU DESERVES EVERYTHING YOU GOT COMING. I WONDER IF THAT GOT THAT IN CALI? IT WILL MAKE THEM HO’S THINK TWICE.

  • VA666

    I agree that the husband should be just as accountable. But maybe this will be a deterrent to women who feel like this type of ho-ish behavior is acceptable. If they refuse to participate, then these sorry-a.s.s, cheating-a.s.s men will have no choice but to be faithful to their wives. And maybe, eventually one day everybody will go back to the days of respecting the sanctity of marriage.

  • TINALOVE

    even though the mistress isn’t married to her she was a active participant who wasn’t in the dark about his marriage! they BOTH are equally wrong and will reap the harvest for their dishonest ad hurtful actions. I know you all want to blame him, and that’s valid, but it doesn’t exclude her! they BOTH should pay! for all ya’ll know she may be the type that purposely goes after married men, don’t excuse the mistresses when they’re educated in the mans relationship status and STILL sleeping with him.

  • Cadence

    You can always tell who the hoes are on this blog. They always taking up for the “other woman”. LOL

1 2 3 10
blog comments powered by Disqus