First! Holla!!!

Cigarettes are nasty! Glad to see he’s trying to nip that in the bud. Oh and great covers! OBAMA!

SO TYPICAL, BUMMING NEWPORTS AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY HE GETS!

Good Mornin Folks!!

Top 10 one mo’ gin…I support Barack Obama 100%

I love this man, make him the one! I wish I could be a us citizen to vote for this amazing man!!!!

Beyoncé looks beautiful ans sophisticated, luv it!

Morning Everyone!

I think Michelle probably has a few “ways” to help him deal with the stress too! I say, Good for you Mr. Soon to be President. Just remember after Nov 4th, no more tobacco! Cause as sweets put it, TOBACCO IS WACKO!

Hey Sweets!

Love the new gravie!!!

Hey Daywalker!

I ASSUME HE ALSO ENJOYS E&J AND MALT LIQUOR WITH HIS NEWPORTS! SMILE

Morning Black Conservative

****NO ONE WANTS TO BE THE ONE THAT’S LOSES TO THE 1st BLACK PRESIDENT!*****

He my big homie right there! Do your thing Barack.

You gots my vote bro!!

Go Obama!!!!!!

Have more sex to releive the campaign stress rather than smoking!

HELLO KEESHA! I AM TRYING TO BE FRIENDLY WITH YOU ALL.

I AM PROUD TO SHARE THAT MY FATHER CONTACTED ME EARLY THIS MORNING AND ASKED THAT I BECOME THE OVERSEER OF ONE OF OUR FAMILY’S MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN MARYLAND! I CAN’T WAIT TO GET TO THE AREA SO IF I DISAPPEAR FOR A FEW DAYS IT IS DUE TO ME LOOKING FOR A NEW RESIDENCE THERE! SMILE

I love Obama. Beyonce you still looking good. Marriage agrees with you. Please show the wedding photos. Talk Jay-Z into showing the photos. Put your mojo on him.

theres no way obama can not win! america is effed up if he doesn’t. the market will crash, all the wildlife because of palin will be shot and the big bad wolf will blow all your homes and apartments down

I cannot WAIT to vote on Oct. 20 (that’s when early voting begins in TX) for this man to be my president—GO BARACK, I SEE YOU SENATOR!!! )

Nice pics, B….

Atleast barack is trying to quit.. i didnt know he was a smoker

I see beyonce is looking edgier than usual

good for him

Just train your mind to think that your a non-smoker…keep telling yourself that you are a non-smoker…it’ll work…if you want it to.

It’s an ugly habit…’specially for women…not cute at all.

That’s why his lips are so black!

Queen Bey’s looking a little Rihannaish.Disturbia?

he can bum one off me

ARE WE SURPRISED BY THIS

WASHINGTON – The National Rifle Association is endorsing Republican presidential nominee John McCain despite differences with the Arizona senator on gun-show rules and campaign finance restrictions.

NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and the chairman of the NRA’s political action committee planned stops Thursday in Pennsylvania, Missouri, Colorado and Nevada to talk about the move.

LaPierre said the two agree on many issues important to the group.

“He’s cast more than 60 votes in the Senate in support of the Second Amendment,” LaPierre said.

The NRA’s Political Victory Fund has spent more than $2.3 million opposing Democratic nominee Barack Obama. The chairman of the political action committee, Chris W. Cox, says its spending in the presidential race will grow to “eight figures” by Election Day. Besides ads, encouraging battleground-state gun owners to vote will be a key focus, he said.

The PAC was running an ad Thursday in USA Today accusing Obama of waffling on gun-rights issues and challenging his statements that he supports the right to bear arms. Obama has said he respects the Second Amendment but doesn’t think it precludes “some commonsense gun laws so that we don’t have kids being shot on the streets of cities like Chicago.”

The NRA PAC’s future spending will target Obama on gun issues and start publicizing the records of McCain and his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, LaPierre said. McCain’s selection of Palin was a plus, LaPierre said.

“She’s a hunter, she’s a Second Amendment supporter and she’s a tremendous asset to the ticket,” he said.

Palin, an NRA member, received an A-plus rating from the group when she ran for governor in 2006. That compares to an NRA grade in the average range for McCain in his last Senate race. McCain isn’t an NRA member.

Palin has been an NRA booster, particularly for its education and safety programs, during her career in government. As mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she used $750 from her city campaign fund to upgrade her NRA membership.

The NRA doesn’t always endorse presidential candidates. It has backed President Bush but declined to endorse Bob Dole in the 1996 race or President George H.W. Bush in 1992.

Obama has been endorsed by the American Hunters and Shooters Association, which calls itself a “mainstream group of hunters” that supports safe and responsible gun ownership.

I am so proud of Obama. Not just for quitting ciggarettes, but for all of his accomplishments. I am so proud of him. He is really doing his thing and I support him 100%

Stop writing paragraphz Buffalo Ho

Obama is so elegant I really hope he wins

LOL

THATS A GREAT SOURCE MAG COVER. Can I say it now??

YESSSSSSSSSSSSS WE CAN !!!!!!!!!!!!

I am way “blacker” than Obama.I used to smoke Newport n drink old english whisky. That doesnt make me any more “presidential”.

So close to the Promise land. We dont intend on voting for Flavor Flav as Leader of the Free World !!! Do we?? LOL

I bet he smokes KOOL…

I bet he smokes cock.

THAT SHOULD BE MCCAIN ON THE COVER…

Morning Peeps! That’s why people love this man-cuz in addition to all of his other qualities, Barack Obama is honest about his flaws. Barack the vote!!!

I don’t like something serious like the fate of our future being featured with a sex symbol.

One thing that Pisses me off or well, it doesnt piss me off BUT i wonder why Beyonce is soooo afraid or reluctant rather to change her hair style. She has been rocking that same hair for atleast 10 yrs now. Changes the color sometimes but always goes back to the same style. I wish she would change it up abit, take a risk, she is a pretty girl she can do so much. Not hating BUT would love to see something new from her…..

I can see it now, if Obama wins this election, one of his first stabs at solving our economic crisis will be to sell square footage on the White House lawn to the manufacturers of Newports, which will allow them to replace the American Flag with one of their large poster ads.

@ OK

just cuz da man is a sex symbol means nothing. Before he started being referred to as a sex symbol he was on his J.O.B. he can’t help it if he look damn gud.

and for him to be a smoker he still has some pretty gud luking lips

and for him to be a smoker he still has some pretty gud luking lips

Yeah, if you go for those purple-black liver lips.

I support Obama, but I still think the Republicans and Democrats are one party secretly, and act together. Look at the 700 billion dollar rescue bill. They knew the public was opposed to it, but they still passed it. No matter who ends up in the White House, America is on a downward spiral.

Did anyone catch Michelle Obama on Larry King yesterday?

@ I’m just me

No… I’m not surprised at all.

@HF

No, you are the only loser who watched it

Did anyone catch Michelle Obama on Larry King yesterday?

**************************************************

@HF

I watched! Michelle was wonderful, well poised and professional as usual!

Hi, HF! I caught a snippet of it, but I missed most of it. I also missed her on The Daily Show last night. What were the highlights?

Also, I posted this on another thread, but thesmokinggun(dot)com posted the mug shot yesterday of a Louisiana man who threatened election officials after he failed to receive his registration card. He said he needed to vote to keep the “ni**er out of office.”

Hi Sydney, I was in class when the interview was on. When I get time I’ll see if it’s on CNN’s website.

@ Stefany, u confirmed what I already figured on. I haven’t been this stoked about a 1st lady since…… since…… since….

u get my drift.

Well at least he shows he is human, everybody got to have a weakness…it could have been women or drugs or worse

BE

Well at least he shows he is human, everybody got to have a weakness…it could have been women or drugs or worse

______________________________________________

….or stolen prescription drugs….

WASHINGTON — After forgoing character attacks during the second presidential debate, Republican John McCain sought Wednesday to sow doubt about Democrat Barack Obama’s background and character. Obama, meanwhile, accused the McCain campaign of trying to “score cheap political points.”

Both candidates tried to play into voters’ worries about the other with a mere four weeks to go before Election Day. McCain is perceived as being weak on the economy, and Obama continued a line of attack against the veteran senator for saying recently that the fundamentals of the U.S. economy were strong.

McCain and his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, challenged Obama’s campaign claims, stressed his lack of experience and said his ideas were dangerous.

“We’ve all heard what he’s said. But it’s less clear what he’s done, or what he will do,” McCain told supporters in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.

McCain’s remarks about Obama were interrupted with shouts of “socialist,” “terrorist” and “liar.”

Palin said there were too many questions about Obama’s past: “John McCain didn’t just come out of nowhere. The American people know John McCain.”

And for the second time in three days, a speaker at a Republican rally invoked Obama’s middle name, Hussein, in an apparent attempt to feed lingering fears about the Democrat’s background.

Lehigh County Republican Chairman Bill Platt twice used Obama’s middle name before McCain and Palin arrived at the campaign stop in the town of Bethlehem. The campaign quickly issued a statement saying it did not condone “this inappropriate rhetoric.”

McCain has called the use of Obama’s middle name both improper and inappropriate and once apologized after a supporter warming up a rally used it. Hussein is a common name in Muslim cultures and its use in the campaign is seen as an effort to link Obama to radical Islam even though he is a Christian. Obama’s father was a Muslim from Kenya.

Wednesday’s attacks came after Palin over the weekend repeatedly went after Obama, claiming he is close with William Ayers, a founder of the violent Vietnam-era group the Weather Underground. Obama and Ayers live in the same Chicago neighborhood and have served together on community boards.

Obama, speaking in an ABC News interview televised Wednesday night, shot back at the McCain campaign, saying they were highlighting his association with Ayers in an effort to “score cheap political points” in the final weeks before the election.

Obama said he was surprised McCain didn’t bring the attacks up at this week’s second presidential debate.

“I am surprised that, you know, we’ve been seeing some pretty over-the-top attacks coming out of the McCain campaign over the last several days, that he wasn’t willing to say it to my face. But I guess we’ve got one last debate. So presumably, if he ends up feeling that he needs to, he will raise it during the debate.”

Palin first accused Obama of “palling around with terrorists,” then recalibrated her criticism to say the lack of clarity about the Ayers-Obama relationship was a legitimate campaign issue because it speaks to Obama’s truthfulness and judgment.

Obama said Wednesday that he has said many times that Ayers “engaged in some despicable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old” and that he was an education professor at the University of Illinois when they met 10 or 15 years ago.

“The notion that somehow he has been involved in my campaign, that he is an adviser of mine, that he — I’ve palled around with a terrorist, all these statements are made simply to try to score cheap political points,” Obama said.

The return to heavily negative campaigning by the Republican ticket came as McCain, behind in the polls, gained no ground following Tuesday night’s debate with Obama.

With time running out and U.S. and global financial institutions battered as badly as at any time in nearly eight decades, American voters appeared increasingly disinclined to put a Republican back in the White House, regardless of concerns about whether Obama, a first-term senator, has enough experience.

The Democrat leads in key states and the most recent Gallup Poll daily tracking survey showed Obama expanding his lead over McCain to 11 percentage points, though he has yet to sew up the race.

At the debate, Obama and McCain stood back from the vitriol that was consuming the campaign in the days leading up to the town-hall forum at Belmont University, which snap polls after the give and take showed Obama had won.

The only new proposal McCain brought to voters in the Nashville, Tennessee, confrontation Tuesday night was $300 billion in additional government spending on sour mortgages.

On Wednesday, McCain added he would “confront” the massive federal debt and would balance the annual federal budget by the end of his term in office, without specifying whether he meant in four years or perhaps eight years should he be elected twice.

McCain has long promised to balance the budget but this was the first time he renewed the pledge since the enactment of a $700 billion bailout this month of troubled financial institutions which could complicate such an effort.

Obama’s campaign released a statement Wednesday criticizing McCain’s mortgage bailout plan, saying it would cause the government to lose money by paying too much for bad loans.

Speaking to several thousand people in Indianapolis, Obama acknowledged public anxiety over the financial crisis.

“This isn’t a time for fear or panic,” he said. “This is a time for resolve and leadership.”

He also sought to tie his rival to the unpopular Republican president, George W. Bush.

“All we heard from Sen. McCain was more of the same Bush economics that led us into this mess,” Obama said. The Illinois Democrat urged supporters not to be “hoodwinked” or “bamboozled” by what he called downsides to McCain’s health care proposals.

Meanwhile, Palin’s husband weighed in for the first time on a controversy over whether his wife, in her role as Alaska’s governor, abused her power in firing a state official.

Palin and her husband, Todd, are the focus of an investigation by a legislative panel in Alaska.

The Palins are accused of pressuring Public Safety Commissioner Walter Monegan to fire a state police officer who had gone through a messy divorce with the governor’s sister. When he resisted, Monegan says, Gov. Palin fired him.

The panel is expected to meet Friday and release a potentially embarrassing report into the firing.

In an affidavit submitted by Todd Palin to the investigators in response to questions given to him, the governor’s husband defended his role as a close adviser to his wife but was adamant that he never pressured anyone — including his wife — about the officer.

@HF

No problem, I can just look up the Larry King transcript online. I did see a small segment, and Michelle looked very poised and reflective — a stark contrast to the anger Cindy McCain exhibited yesterday at the rally.

Yup, I’m Just Me, the Troopergate report is scheduled to drop tomorrow, so expect another major distraction from the McCain campaign.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has a commentary today on The Huffington Post on the Alaskan Independence Party. This Vogler character sounds unstable:

Palin, it could be argued, following her own logic, thinks so little of America’s perfection that she continues to “pal around” with a man–her husband, actually–who only recently terminated his seven-year membership in the Alaskan Independence Party. Putting plunder above patriotism, the members of this treasonous cabal aim to break our country into pieces and walk away with Alaska’s rich federal oil fields and one-fifth of America’s land base–an area three-fourths the size of the Civil War Confederacy.

AIP’s charter commits the party “to the ultimate independence of Alaska,” from the United States which it refers to as “the colonial bureaucracy in Washington.” It proclaims Alaska’s 1959 induction as a state “as illegal and in violation of the United Nations charter and international law.”

AIP’s creation was inspired by the rabidly violent anti-Americanism of its founding father Joe Vogler, “I’m an Alaskan, not an American,” reads a favorite Vogler quote on AIP’s current website, “I’ve got no use for America or her damned institutions.” According to Vogler AIP’s central purpose was to drive Alaska’s secession from the United States. Alaska, says current Chairwoman Lynette Clark, “should be an independent nation.”

Vogler was murdered in 1993 during an illegal sale of plastic explosives that went bad. The prior year, he had renounced his allegiance to the United States explaining that, “The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government.” He cursed the stars and stripes, promising, “I won’t be buried under their damned flag…when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home.” Palin has never denounced Vogler or his detestable anti-Americanism.

Barack Obama looks good on this cover too!

**The New York Times, www(dot)nytimes(dot)com, has a disturbing story today about the removal of voters from the registration in six swing states (excerpt below). Officials are recommending that people check their voter registrations with their local boards of elections:

The six swing states seem to be in violation of federal law in two ways. Michigan and Colorado are removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election, which is not allowed except when voters die, notify the authorities that they have moved out of state, or have been declared unfit to vote.

Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio seem to be improperly using Social Security data to verify registration applications for new voters.

In addition to the six swing states, three more states appear to be violating federal law. Alabama and Georgia seem to be improperly using Social Security information to screen registration applications from new voters. And Louisiana appears to have removed thousands of voters after the federal deadline for taking such action.

Redd Tony,

That’s interesting 4 real. Ol’ Warren must have got him some uh, “inside info”.

Sydney

**The New York Times, www(dot)nytimes(dot)com, has a disturbing story today about the removal of voters from the registration in six swing states (excerpt below). Officials are recommending that people check their voter registrations with their local boards of elections:

The six swing states seem to be in violation of federal law in two ways. Michigan and Colorado are removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election, which is not allowed except when voters die, notify the authorities that they have moved out of state, or have been declared unfit to vote.

Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio seem to be improperly using Social Security data to verify registration applications for new voters.

In addition to the six swing states, three more states appear to be violating federal law. Alabama and Georgia seem to be improperly using Social Security information to screen registration applications from new voters. And Louisiana appears to have removed thousands of voters after the federal deadline for taking such action.

_________________________________________________

…annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd we’re off!

I have a feeling this election process is gonna make the 2000 election look like a cakewalk.

Interesting… the states involved in this story.

Just a thought…

Why is a topic of interest always income tax cuts, why not Property Tax, Luxury tax, or state tax purchase cuts. Obama/McCain promises income tax cuts, but in the end property, local, luxury taxes continue to rise…My property taxes rose as much to increase my mortgage payment by $200.00 per month…It seems to me the public wont reap the benefits of the so called income tax cut since all of the other taxes continue to rise….just a thought

I’m trying to quit smoking black & mild cigars. This is very helpful!!!

Obama-Biden 2008 & 2012!!!

Lol. Beyonce said in this upcomiong Essence isuue… “Its not about interviews, or photo ops…” Well Obama sure is getting a hell of a lot of photo ops than you

@HF

Yeah, I think you’re right. It’s going to be a circus. People are going to have to be extra-vigilant to make sure their registration is up to date, and they know what to expect on Election Day. I’m pretty sure the Democratic voter turnout — particularly among people of color — this year is going to be much higher than in past elections, so I expect all sorts of voter suppression shenanigans.

BTW, on Morning Joe this morning, they mentioned a new site called The Daily Beast, www(dot)thedailybeast(dot)com, that has interesting news bit.

*bits*

Thanks Earth Sign. It’s true, you learn something new everyday. Now on the topic: Quitting is easier said then done. So to President Obama I say, NEVER GIVE UP!

I am now watching Michelle on Larry King. What a jewel! What a queen! I love her positivity! I love her rationale! She’s awesome! I love her! I really do! I know I sound like a groupie-but that lady is so humble and sweet!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

DEAD…

Obama Sheeple Cheer Police Violation Of Free Speech

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Police kicked protester Benjamin Harms off Belmont University campus this week before the presidential debate for the crime of “trespassing” as hundreds of mindless Obama supporters cheered the outright violation of free speech.

The protagonist’s attempts to succinctly explain the banker bailout scam – which Barack Obama has fully supported – in clear and concise terms was met with the mindless bleating of “Obama, Obama, Obama” – perfectly underscoring the vacuum of Obama’s empty platitudes of “change” and the deluded idolatry of his supporters.

“Obama and McCain are the same,” chanted another demonstrator as police and security thugs moved in to ensure that anyone that dared use their freedom of speech to communicate a real message was hastily ejected, while the Obama cult members were left completely alone to continue their pointless rhetoric.

“Kick him out, kick him out,” chanted the Obama-ites as the group tried to explain to the police the meaning of the first amendment.

“I am now being escorted away by police from the scene because I don’t have a right to free speech,” said Harms, to which the Obama crowd responded with whoops, cries and hollers of “yeeeeahhhh” in celebration of the fact that cops were crushing the first amendment.

“I have a right to speak my mind just like all of you do,” added Harms.

“They don’t like what I’m saying so I’m being escorted by the police off of the campus.”

Police threatened to arrest Harms and refused to tell him where the property line of the campus was. They were also unable to tell him why the use of a bullhorn was illegal, enforcing a claimed law of which they had no knowledge.

Watch the clip below.

YOUTUBE IT…

Thousands of Troops Are Deployed on U.S. Streets Ready to Carry Out “Crowd Control”

Naomi Wolf

AlterNet

October 8, 2008.

Background: the First Brigade of the Third Infantry Division, three to four thousand soldiers, has been deployed in the United States as of October 1. Their stated mission is the form of crowd control they practiced in Iraq, subduing “unruly individuals,” and the management of a national emergency. I am in Seattle and heard from the brother of one of the soldiers that they are engaged in exercises now. Amy Goodman reported that an Army spokesperson confirmed that they will have access to lethal and non lethal crowd control technologies and tanks.

George Bush struck down Posse Comitatus, thus making it legal for military to patrol the U.S. He has also legally established that in the “War on Terror,” the U.S. is at war around the globe and thus the whole world is a battlefield. Thus the U.S. is also a battlefield.

He also led change to the 1807 Insurrection Act to give him far broader powers in the event of a loosely defined “insurrection” or many other “conditions” he has the power to identify. The Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus — habeas corpus prevents us from being seized by the state and held without trial — in the event of an “insurrection.” With his own army force now, his power to call a group of protesters or angry voters “insurgents” staging an “insurrection” is strengthened.

U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California said to Congress, captured on C-Span and viewable on YouTube, that individual members of the House were threatened with martial law within a week if they did not pass the bailout bill:

“The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and sustaining a panic atmosphere. … Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day and a couple of thousand on the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.”

If this is true and Rep. Sherman is not delusional, I ask you to consider that if they are willing to threaten martial law now, it is foolish to assume they will never use that threat again. It is also foolish to trust in an orderly election process to resolve this threat. And why deploy the First Brigade? One thing the deployment accomplishes is to put teeth into such a threat.

I interviewed Vietnam veteran, retired U.S. Air Force Colonel and patriot David Antoon for clarification:

“If the President directed the First Brigade to arrest Congress, what could stop him?”

“Nothing. Their only recourse is to cut off funding. The Congress would be at the mercy of military leaders to go to them and ask them not to obey illegal orders.”

“But these orders are now legal?’”

“Correct.”

“If the President directs the First Brigade to arrest a bunch of voters, what would stop him?”

“Nothing. It would end up in courts but the action would have been taken.”

“If the President directs the First Brigade to kill civilians, what would stop him?”

“Nothing.”

“What would prevent him from sending the First Brigade to arrest the editor of the Washington Post?”

“Nothing. He could do what he did in Iraq — send a tank down a street in Washington and fire a shell into the Washington Post as they did into Al Jazeera, and claim they were firing at something else.”

“What happens to members of the First Brigade who refuse to take up arms against U.S. citizens?”

“They’d probably be treated as deserters as in Iraq: arrested, detained and facing five years in prison. In Iraq a study by Ann Wright shows that deserters — reservists who refused to go back to Iraq — got longer sentences than war criminals.”

“Does Congress have any military of their own?”

“No. Congress has no direct control of any military units. The Governors have the National Guard but they report to the President in an emergency that he declares.”

“Who can arrest the President?”

“The Attorney General can arrest the President after he leaves or after impeachment.”

[Note: Prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi has asserted it is possible for District Attorneys around the country to charge President Bush with murder if they represent districts where one or more military members who have been killed in Iraq formerly resided.]

“Given the danger do you advocate impeachment?”

“Yes. President Bush struck down Posse Comitatus — which has prevented, with a penalty of two years in prison, U.S. leaders since after the Civil War from sending military forces into our streets — with a ’signing statement.’ He should be impeached immediately in a bipartisan process to prevent the use of military forces and mercenary forces against U.S. citizens”

“Should Americans call on senior leaders in the Military to break publicly with this action and call on their own men and women to disobey these orders?”

“Every senior military officer’s loyalty should ultimately be to the Constitution. Every officer should publicly break with any illegal order, even from the President.”

“But if these are now legal. If they say, ‘Don’t obey the Commander in Chief,’ what happens to the military?”

“Perhaps they would be arrested and prosecuted as those who refuse to participate in the current illegal war. That’s what would be considered a coup.”

“But it’s a coup already.”

GOOD FOR YOU President Obama!!!!

You should smoke

Chavez: “Comrade Bush” a Socialist

Russia Today

October 8, 2008

George Bush has been the target of fresh jibes by Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez for doing exactly what he was criticising the socialist leader for – overriding market laws to protect the economy.

Critics say the U.S. bailout plan is an example of a double standard by the Bush administration, reports America’s McClatchy newspaper.

“If the Venezuelan government, for example, approves a law to protect consumers, they say, ‘Take notice, Chavez is a tyrant!’” said Chavez, speaking in one of his recent weekly television shows.

“Or they say, ‘Chavez is regulating prices. He is violating the laws of the marketplace.’ How many times have they criticised me for nationalising the phone company? They say, ‘The state shouldn’t get involved in that.’ But now they don’t criticize Bush for having to nationalise (the biggest banks in the world.) Comrade Bush, how are you?”

Warming to his theme, he added: “Comrade Bush is heading toward socialism.”

Nicaragua Congressman Edwin Castro agreed: “We think the Bush administration should follow the same policies that they and the International Monetary Fund have always told us to follow when we have economic problems — a structural adjustment that requires cutting government spending and reducing the role of government.”

Meanwhile, Bush said the bailout plan, that will see $700 billion of government money used to buy toxic mortgages, was necessary, although he said it stood against his personal philosophy.

I was gonna say you should stick to those Cali Greens ne way lol! At least you get something out of it and tastes much better LOL!!!

I’m sure you can get your doctor to write you a prescription for SOMETHING that will qualify you to smoke greens “legally” I’ll even go to the shop for you!

Is the Federal Reserve Engaged in Acts of Economic Warfare Against America?

Mike Adams

Natural News

October 8, 2008

In 1942, German intelligence officers rounded up skilled Jewish prisoners and launched Operation Bernhardt, a clever scheme designed to counterfeit hundreds of millions of dollars worth of British Pounds and destroy the British economy by flooding it with counterfeit money. Located in the Sachsenhausen concentration camp, Operation Bernhardt was, even by modern standards, a runaway success that resulted in the creation of forged bank notes worth 132 million British Pounds.

This “economic warfare” operation resulted in a devastating economic effect on the British economy. You can read the true history of this operation here: GOOGLE IT…

It is important to note that Operation Bernhardt was an act of war, specifically pursued for the purpose of destroying Britain’s economy by creating so much new money that the value of the money already in circulation would plummet. This was considered a strategic attack, just as effective as carpet-bombing tank factories or mowing down soldiers on the field with German-made MG42 machine guns.

What does all this have to do with the Federal Reserve?

Today, the Federal Reserve is engaged in an eerily similar operation, counterfeiting trillions of dollars in U.S. bank notes and flooding the U.S. money supply with money created from nothing. The result, of course, is the same as was intended by Operation Bernhardt in 1942: The economic destruction of the target nation. Only this time, the target is the United States of America.

Hilariously, the Fed claims it’s doing this to save the economy. Yet the laws of economics tell us that flooding the money supply with trillions of dollars in new money actually harms the economy. And the Fed has been hard at work causing this harm: $250+ billion two weeks ago, $600+ billion last week and $900 billion earlier this week! It’s beginning to crank up the printing presses to the tune of a trillion dollars a week, and by doing so, it’s contributing to the destruction of the U.S. economy at a pace the Third Reich could have barely imagined.

Has the Fed declared war on the working class?

If the actions pursued by the Federal Reserve were being masterminded by Al-Qaeda, they would be denounced as acts of war. In World War II, such actions were deliberate acts of war. Targeting the economy for destruction by flooding the money supply with counterfeit currency is, by any measure, a threat to any nation.

So why is the Federal Reserve engaged in actions that, if committed by other nations, would warrant a military response? This is not an idle question. I’m not asking this in a satirical way. I’m quite serious about this: Why is the Fed committing acts of economic warfare against the United States of America? (The Fed, by the way, is a private company. It is not, as you’ve been led to believe, part of the U.S. government.)

The answer is obvious. You’ve probably already figured it out: The Federal Reserve is at war with America. It’s an economic war, of course, not a bombs-and-bullets war. The casualties, though, are just as real: Savings accounts, retirement funds, bank accounts, jobs, businesses, pensions and much more.

By counterfeiting trillions of dollars like a Sachsenhausen operation on steroids, the Fed is carpet-bombing the U.S. economy with an unprecedented flood of fiat currency, causing the exact same economic destruction intended by the Nazis in World War II (but on a much more devastating scale). And it’s doing this as part of a new economic war.

Eliminate “certain key connections – that first cigarette in the morning, or after a meal, or with a drink,” he says.

**************************************

I like that idea. I’m gonna try to use it. Let’s see if I can give up that morning smoke.

Did you know all 43 U.S. presidents have carried European royal bloodlines into office? 34 have been genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne, the brutal eighth century King of the Franks. 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England. In fact, the presidential candidate with the most royal genes has won every single American election.

HE WHO HAS THE BLOODLINE OF THE ELITE DETERMINES WHO BECOMES PRESIDENT OF THE US, NOT THE PEOPLE

Sydney, it seems Obama is getting support from an unusual constituency. It’s kinda funny, but pretty cool at the same time. From the AFP:

‘Rednecks for Obama’ want to bridge yawning culture gap

by Michael Mathes

SAINT LOUIS, Missouri (AFP) – When Barack Obama’s campaign bus made a swing through Missouri in July, the unlikeliest of supporters were waiting for him — or rather two of them, holding the banner: “Rednecks for Obama.”

In backing the first African-American nominee of a major party for the US presidency, the pair are on a grassroots mission to bridge a cultural gap in the United States and help usher their preferred candidate into the White House.

Tony Viessman, 74, and Les Spencer, 60, got politically active last year when it occurred to them there must be other lower income, rural, beer-drinking, gun-loving, NASCAR race enthusiasts fed up with business as usual in Washington.

Viessman had a red, white and blue “Rednecks for Obama” banner made, and began causing a stir in Missouri, which has emerged as a key battleground in the run-up to the November 4 presidential election.

“I didn’t expect it would get as much steam and attention as it’s gotten,” Spencer told AFP on the campus of Washington University in Saint Louis, the state’s biggest city and site of last week’s vice-presidential debate.

“We believe in him. He’s the best person for the job,” Viessman, a former state trooper from Rolla, said of Obama, who met the pair briefly on that July day in Union, Missouri.

The candidate bounded off his bus and jogged back towards a roadside crowd to shake hands with the men holding the banner.

“He said ‘This is incredible’,” Spencer recalled.

It’s been an unexpectedly gratifying run, Viessman said.

Rednecks4obama.com claims more than 800,000 online visits. In Denver, Colorado, Viessman and Spencer drew crowds at the Democratic convention, and at Washington University last Thursday they were two of the most popular senior citizens on campus.

“I’m shocked, actually, but excited” that such a demographic would be organizing support for Obama, said student Naia Ferguson, 18, said after hamming it up for pictures behind the banner.

“When most people think ‘redneck,’ they think conservatives, anti-change, even anti-integration,” she said. “But America’s changing, breaking stereotypes.”

A southern comedian, Jeff Foxworthy, defines the stereotype as a “glorious lack of sophistication”.

Philistines or not, he said, most rural southerners are no longer proponents of the Old South’s most abhorrent ideology — racism — and that workaday issues such as the economy are dominating this year’s election.

“We need to build the economy from the bottom up, none of this trickle down business,” Spencer said. “Just because you’re white and southern don’t mean you have to vote Republican.”

To an important degree, however, race is still the elephant in the polling booth, experts say, and according to a recent Stanford University poll, Obama could lose six points on election day due to his color.

Racism “has softened up some, but it’s still there,” Viessman acknowledged from Belmont University, site of Tuesday’s McCain-Obama debate in Nashville, Tennessee.

Despite representing the heartland state of Illinois, and having a more working-class upbringing than his Republican rival John McCain, Obama has struggled to shoot down the impression that he is an arugula-eating elitist.

Surely he alienated many rural voters earlier this year when the Harvard-educated senator told a fundraiser that some blue-collar voters “cling to guns or religion”.

But Viessman, who says he owns a dozen guns, said Obama “ain’t gonna take your guns away.”

The South traditionally votes Republican — victories for southerners Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter were exceptions — but with less than a month to election day, four states in or bordering the South are considered toss-ups: Florida, Missouri, North Carolina and Virginia.

Viessman says he’d like to think his grassroots movement could sway enough people in small-town America to make a difference.

“There’s lots of other rednecks for Obama too,” he said. “And the ones that’s not, we’re trying our best to convince them.”

GO OBAMA GO!!!

SMOKING IS STUPID, HARMFUL, AND WASTES MONEY!!!!!!!

GO OBAMA GO!!!

TO ALL THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS……….

DO YOU THINK LIBERTARIANISM OR ANARCHISM IS THE WAY TO GO???

JUST ASKING.

@Da Truff

If your question was to me, I am for Libertarianism of course

HF, thanks for that story! That is great news, particularly since that has been a very difficult constituency for Obama to reach. I also read a recent story in the Wall Street Journal about the outreach of unions to working-class white voters. The New Yorker also has a article this week, The Hardest Vote, that touches on this demographic.

Redd and those gosh darn bloodlines. . .You know that Palin is reportedly related to FDR and Princess Di, right? So does that mean she’s destined to become the first woman vp? Hmmm. . .

@Sydney

Speaking of first woman President, beleive it or not I think Clintons daughter Chelsey will try and make a run one day when she is older…

Below is a brief summary of the role of voters and the Electoral College in selecting the next president. Contrary to some of the “theories” that are spouted here regularly, it is very important that there is a high voter turnout on Nov. 4:

Americans elect the President and Vice-president through a method of indirect popular election. On November 4, 2008, voters cast their ballots for a presidential candidate. However, votes actually count towards a group of electors who pledge to vote for a specific candidate when the Electoral College meets in December. The “Electoral College” is the unofficial term coined in the 1800s for the group of citizens selected by the people to cast votes for President and Vice President.

The presidential/vice-presidential pair who wins the popular vote in any given state receives all* of the state’s number of Electoral College votes. In the end, the winner of the race is the candidate who receives a majority (270) of the 538 Electoral College votes. The results of the 2008 election won’t be official until the President of the Senate counts the votes out loud at a special joint session of Congress held on January 6, 2009.

@Redd

And does Chelsea have the appropriate bloodline to pursue such a high office?

Sydney(Check me out!)

@Redd

And does Chelsea have the appropriate bloodline to pursue such a high office?

__________________-

Why yes…After all She is a Clinton….

@Redd

Thanks, I just wanted confirmation. So, I guess Obama’s bloodlines trumped Hillary’s this go-round, eh? She hails from an upper-crust family, but I guess her genealogy isn’t high-brow enough. . .

Sydney(Check me out!)

Below is a brief summary of the role of voters and the Electoral College in selecting the next president. Contrary to some of the “theories” that are spouted here regularly, it is very important that there is a high voter turnout on Nov. 4:

Americans elect the President and Vice-president through a method of indirect popular election. On November 4, 2008, voters cast their ballots for a presidential candidate. However, votes actually count towards a group of electors who pledge to vote for a specific candidate when the Electoral College meets in December. The “Electoral College” is the unofficial term coined in the 1800s for the group of citizens selected by the people to cast votes for President and Vice President.

The presidential/vice-presidential pair who wins the popular vote in any given state receives all* of the state’s number of Electoral College votes. In the end, the winner of the race is the candidate who receives a majority (270) of the 538 Electoral College votes. The results of the 2008 election won’t be official until the President of the Senate counts the votes out loud at a special joint session of Congress held on January 6, 2009.

______________________-

Sydney you know there were opponents of the electorial college since its conception stating that there is a slim to none chance a minority President can win an American election, meaning that unless the minority population is on par with majority, a minority President will not win……just saying

Sydney(Check me out!)

@Redd

Thanks, I just wanted confirmation. So, I guess Obama’s bloodlines trumped Hillary’s this go-round, eh? She hails from an upper-crust family, but I guess her genealogy isn’t high-brow enough. . .

__________________________-

Well remember Hillary was married into the Clinton clan; she may very well have elite Euro blood too, but not as thick as slick Willie himself…

@Redd

Now I’m confused. So you’re saying under this system, a minority cannot win the election? You’ve said Obama is destined to win, no?

@ Redd Tony

@Da Truff

If your question was to me, I am for Libertarianism of course

===================================================

SO WHAT DO YOU FEEL THE GOV’S ROLL WOULD BE IN YOUR IDEAL SOCIETY…, AND HOW WOULD THEY PAY FOR IT???

@ SYDNEY

HEY SYD!!!

I SEE YOU HOLDIN’ IT DOWN!!! LOL!

Hey, Truff! *waving*

I’m just trying to understand Redd’s theories — he’s harder to pin down than Sarah Palin during the Katie Couric interview. . .

MAVERICK!

LOL

Obama 08!

Sydney(Check me out!)

@Redd

Now I’m confused. So you’re saying under this system, a minority cannot win the election? You’ve said Obama is destined to win, no?

______________________________

Obama is destined to win..

I said Opponents against the electorial college were saying that according that system a minority would have a slim to none chance of winning…little did they know that regardless of electorial college, popular vote, or single vote, bloodline is what counts…

@BLACK CONSERVATIVE-”SO TYPICAL, BUMMING NEWPORTS AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY HE GETS!”

_____________________________________

You are really ignorant. So what if he’s stressed, running for president…With all the hatemongering and fear tactics, your fake and lame as- party does WHEN THEIR DESPERATION STARTS TO SHOW, BECAUSE THEY ARE LOSERS, THAT ARE LOSING!! STOOP TO ALL TIME NEW LOW LEVELS…BUT HEY WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM REPUBS? THIS YEAR, THE WHOLE KLAN IS LOWEST OF THE LOW, I’M ACTUALLY ASHAMED TO BE A REPUB….HOWEVER, THIS YEAR I AM VOTING BARACK OBAMA. TOMORROW, I WILL MAKE YET ANOTHER DONATION TO HIS CAMPAIGN. I WILL MAKE A DONATION AT LEAST ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK. I REALLY WANT HIM TO WIN…

______________________________

GTFO Him, why do you even bother coming to this site. Your views suck and so do you, this is an Obama site!…REAL CONSERVATIVE= REAL TRASH…

You don’t support him, so why are you all on his threads??? Your such a LOSER!!…

DA TRUFF ??? YOU CAN’T HANDLE DA TRUFF!!!!!!!(Check me out!)

@ Redd Tony

@Da Truff

If your question was to me, I am for Libertarianism of course

===================================================

SO WHAT DO YOU FEEL THE GOV’S ROLL WOULD BE IN YOUR IDEAL SOCIETY…, AND HOW WOULD THEY PAY FOR IT???

_______________________

Well I would want a government that stays true to the Constution, and everyday it seems to be undermined…

@Redd

“little did they know that regardless of electorial college, popular vote, or single vote, bloodline is what counts…”

Well, that clears that up! They don’t know whom they’re messing with, do they?

Sydney(Check me out!)

@Redd

“little did they know that regardless of electorial college, popular vote, or single vote, bloodline is what counts…”

Well, that clears that up! They don’t know whom they’re messing with, do they?

_________________-

Naw…you, yall, or anybody for Obama or McCain dont know, or find that hard to swallow

@Redd

Yup, and if they didn’t know, they better ask somebody, right?

I just love looking at this man!

@Sydney

You cant see that McCain is shooting himself in the ass everyday since he picked Palin as his running mate? Do you think he picked Palin to help win the election?.. People kill me sometimes cuz yall are so gullible absorbing the little stuff like McCain called the Obama “that one over there” or how many times Palin says Maverick…Come on now..they are playing yall..Every little racist remark, or snide comment or annoying thing they do shores up one vote for Obama…

And Yall call these debates….Please!

that was yourself….

brb

@Redd

If McCain didn’t pick Palin (who has shored up conservative base support to a level unseen in recent years, according to the pundits) to help win the election, why did he pick her? Because she’s cute?

@Sydney… ARE YOU SERIOUSLY THIS BLIND… PLEASE DEFINE CONSERVATIVE… HOW IS JOHN MCCAIN CONSERVATIVE… HOW HAS PALIN SHORED UP THE BASE… ALL I HEAR IS CONSERVATIVES ARE STAYING HOME… LETS GO ISSUE BY ISSUE…

WHAT PUNDITS…? BAJESUS YOU PEOPLE ARE SHEEP… WHATEVER THEY TELL YOU ON YOUR LIBERAL CORPORATE MEDIA… ALL YOU DO IS QUOTE CNN AND REGURGITATE DEMOCRATIC TALKING POINTS…

ANYBODY PLEASE EPLIAN HOW EITHER GEORGE BUSH AND/OR JOHN McCAIN IS A CONSERVATIVE…? PLEASE…

EXPLAIN…

Two things.

1. It’s great he’s trying to quit, he’s got a long life ahead of him. I quit 3 1/2 yrs ago and it is definitely an improvement..although I recommend nicotine patches over just skipping the important cigarettes.

2. The McCain campaign has taken shots at our boy for smoking, when they tried to defend McCain’s health and certain death while in office, saying Obama’s health is worse than McCain’s b/c of smoking..triflin.

John McCain and Bush are conservative for several reasons:

1. They oppose abortion. Even though McCain says he wants to make abortion laws up to the states, he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade and encourage states to be anti-abortion.

2. They oppose gay marriage.

3. Their economic plans concerning tax cuts favor the wealthy and special interests, and follow the “Trickle Down” theory.

4. They oppose gun control, or at least don’t want to expand it.

5. THEY SAY THEY ARE CONSERVATIVE.

@eddiedollars215

Eddie, there have been a multitude of articles and news reports about Palin’s popularity among conservatives. While McCain has often been cast as an outsider, Palin appeals to members of the Far Right, as evidenced by the huge crowds she commands.

New World Order: Global co-operation, nationalisation and state intervention – all in one day

Lindsay McIntosh

The Scotsman

Thursday, Oct 9, 2008

IT WAS a day of desperate global action, unprecedented in both scale and cost, intended to stymie the international devastation being wrought by the financial crisis.

As the London stock market steeled itself to open again following days of vicious battering, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, rose to stake the future of the country and the Cabinet on an audacious £500 billion banking bail-out.

And barely had the City begun to digest the hugely complex and unorthodox scheme when it was sent reeling again by an unscheduled interest rate cut – mirrored across the world – by the Monetary Policy Committee. It was the first such co-ordinated approach since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001 – yet another indicator, had one been needed, of the gravity of the situation.

The half percentage point drop was immediately passed on to millions of borrowers, with leading high-street banks cutting their mortgages.

(Article continues below)

The government’s scheme, a three-part plan which takes in short, medium and long-term measures, was welcomed by business leaders and analysts.

David Kern, adviser to the British Chamber of Commerce, said: “The government has taken a radical step, but it is one we welcome.”

But there was concern a phenomenal amount of taxpayers’ cash was being staked on a last-ditch measure that could fail. The Taxpayers’ Alliance accused ministers of failing to address other options first.

Meanwhile, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) issued a fresh warning that Britain was on the brink of recession.

@ Sydney- McCain picked Palin b/c she is cute and folksy, which he thinks resonates with Conservatives, and b/c he was trying to get the female vote after Hillary wasn’t chosen for VP. Which is f*cked up b/c he thinks women are so stupid that they will just vote for a woman regardless of issues.

damn everybody did coke or is still doing drugs gw bush, pill clinton, bobby, whitney, britney spears, lindsay lohan, amy winehouse, snoop dogg, dmx, sly stone, george clinton, lil kim, boy george, and don’t ebven count the ones who od,.

@Eddiedollars- I’m very liberal, and despite what you think about us just repeating the “liberal corporate media” (which just shows your stupidity- conservative media is known for being way more corporate-driven than liberal, esp because most major news channels lean to the right), but don’t generalize all of us- I KNOW my sh*t.

@Slim

Yes, that’s true that McCain was going after women voters — specifically former Hillary supporters — with the Palin pick, but her popularity is falling among women, according to the most recent polls. There have been some pretty critical articles written by women — such as conservative Kathleen Parker — about Palin’s qualifications.

Palin’s views, such as her pro-life stance, support for abstinence-only education, and belief in Creationism, also make her appealing to conservatives. Her addition to the ticket initially re-energized the McCain campaign — Evangelicals love her.

@ Redd Tony (AGAIN)

@Da Truff

If your question was to me, I am for Libertarianism of course

===================================================

SO WHAT DO YOU FEEL THE GOV’S ROLL WOULD BE IN YOUR IDEAL SOCIETY…, AND HOW WOULD THEY PAY FOR IT???

_______________________

Well I would want a government that stays true to the Constution, and everyday it seems to be undermined…

===================================================

WELL THAT WAS GOOD SARAH PALIN TYPE NON-ANSWER!!! LOL!!!

OK I’LL PLAY…. “TRUE TO THE CONSTITUTION”………

WOULD THAT BE THE ORIGINAL.., FLAWED, EXCLUSIVE, DISCRIMINATORY CONTSTITUTION???

OR THE ONE THE GOV HAS AMMENDED.., OH HOW MANY TIMES??? AND STILL NEEDED HUNDREDS OF OTHER ACTS, LAWS & ORDERS TO GET IT CLOSE TO BEING RIGHT???

YOUR TURN…….

HEY EVERYONE!!!!!

Sorry, I’ve been gone, have a lot going on at work…… Who else is ready to vote early!

Hey WhatsYoursIsMine!

I’m not sure if I’m voting early or not. . .I think I want to have the Election Day experience.

@SLIM… WHO OWNS THE MEDIA…?

@DA TRUFF… WHICH CONSTITUTION DO YOU MEAN… THE ONE FOR THE… UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…. OR THE ONE FOR THE United States Of America…?

@eddiedollars

Do you watch Fox News? Palin and McCain had an interview this week with Sean Hannity, who is ultra conservative.

“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.”

Amschel Mayer Rothschild, 1773-1855

“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.”

Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard – member of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.”

Thomas Jefferson

somebody saddle my horse up im ready 2 ride out of here.

@ Redd Tony (AGAIN)

@Da Truff

If your question was to me, I am for Libertarianism of course

===================================================

SO WHAT DO YOU FEEL THE GOV’S ROLL WOULD BE IN YOUR IDEAL SOCIETY…, AND HOW WOULD THEY PAY FOR IT???

_______________________

Well I would want a government that stays true to the Constution, and everyday it seems to be undermined…

===================================================

WELL THAT WAS GOOD SARAH PALIN TYPE NON-ANSWER!!! LOL!!!

OK I’LL PLAY…. “TRUE TO THE CONSTITUTION”………

WOULD THAT BE THE ORIGINAL.., FLAWED, EXCLUSIVE, DISCRIMINATORY CONTSTITUTION???

OR THE ONE THE GOV HAS AMMENDED.., OH HOW MANY TIMES??? AND STILL NEEDED HUNDREDS OF OTHER ACTS, LAWS & ORDERS TO GET IT CLOSE TO BEING RIGHT???

YOUR TURN…….

***************************************************

OH PLEASE……….

HOW ABOUT JUST ANSWER EITHER ONE(OR BOTH) OF MY QUESTIONS INSTEAD OF TAKING A SENSLESS DIVERSION???????

@WhatsYoursIsMine

That’s probably a good idea to make sure you have everything you need to vote. I was thinking of voting as early as possible in the morning and going to an election party that night.

@eddiedollars

So the “great” Ronald Reagan wasn’t a real conservative?

FYI, Obama now has a double-digit lead in the Gallup poll:

Michigan Rasmussen Obama 56, McCain 40 Obama +16

National Gallup Tracking Obama 52, McCain 41 Obama +11

National Rasmussen Tracking Obama 50, McCain 45 Obama +5

National Hotline/FD Tracking Obama 47, McCain 41 Obama +6

National Reuters/CSpan/Zogby Tracking Obama 48, McCain 44 Obama +4

Virginia PPP (D) Obama 51, McCain 43 Obama +8

New Hampshire ARG Obama 52, McCain 43 Obama +9

Montana ARG McCain 50, Obama 45 McCain +5

National GW/Battleground Tracking Obama 48, McCain 45 Obama +3

Pennsylvania Strategic Vision (R) Obama 54, McCain 40 Obama +14

Georgia Strategic Vision (R) McCain 50, Obama 43 McCain +7

Texas ARG McCain 57, Obama 38 McCain +19

Ohio ARG Obama 48, McCain 45 Obama +3

Minnesota ARG Obama 47, McCain 46 Obama +1

Missouri ARG McCain 49, Obama 46 McCain +3

West Virginia ARG McCain 42, Obama 50 Obama +8

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA… i know i’m likw a walking oxymoron… Yes and No… He was more conservative than others… but still acted a an illuminati agent…

Member, Knights of Malta

Knights of Columbus

Knight of The Most Honorable Order of Bath, and Knight Grand Cross

Yale Chubb Fellow

Reagan’s role model was Franklin D. Roosevelt

Responsible for abortion in California

Bohemian Grove Member

Helene van Damme Reagan’s “Special Assistant”… formerly secretary to the Nazi German High Command

William P. Clark. Counter-intelligence agent, married to Nazi Werner von Braun’s niece, Joan von Braun, and was CFR.

His judges banned/ ban god from public, prayer from school, upheld partial birth, overturned man sex and beastiality laws, ect.

Set up US puppet in Iraq, Saddam Hussein

Set up US hired “general” in the fake Soviet war in Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden

Reagan was president of the Communist-riddled Screen Actors Guild

I COULD GO ON…

@eddiedollars

Did Reagan know he was a member of this “Illuminati?” Does Mrs. Reagan know? Someone ought to tell her. . .

My positions are unique I would probably have to go on an issue by issue basis, and my postings probably don’t illustrate my true feelings on most matters. Furthermore it is near impossible for ME to achieve correct connotation and context… in text… especially over the internet…

Redd Tony

I think this is what you are referring to

William Jefferson Clinton——capitus diminutio Minima

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON——-capitus diminutio Maxima

Barack Obama has purchased a half-hour of airtime on CBS, sources confirm.

The Obama campaign will air a half-hour primetime special on Wednesday, Oct. 29, at 8 p.m.

Sources say the Obama camp is also in talks with NBC and Fox. NBC is said to be very near a deal. With Fox, the matter is likely to remain uncertain as the time period could conflict with Game 6 of the World Series.

A CBS spokesperson declined comment. The buy will push comedy “The New Adventures of Old Christine” to 8:30 p.m. and pre-empt “Gary Unmarried.” The buy is being placed by Washington-based ad firm GMMB.

@REDD… what charge said… HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…

@sydney… of course she/he did… nancy was like queen of the occult

COPY PASTE JOB…

Wife Nancy practiced witchcraft in the Whitehouse, using at least 5 (that we know of) different astrologers and soothsayers while in office, organizing every trip, meeting, conference and flight using witchcraft. Special lines were installed at the White House and Camp David solely to practice divination on all decisions, even with foreign heads of state! Monthly witchcraft fees estimated at $3,000 per month.

CHARGE(Check me out!)

Redd Tony

I think this is what you are referring to

William Jefferson Clinton——capitus diminutio Minima

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON——-capitus diminutio Maxima

__________________

BINGO!!! THANKS MY DUDE……THOSE THAT ARE NOT FIMILIAR WITH THIS GET FAMILIAR

@eddiedollars

Say what?!? Nancy Reagan practiced witchcraft in the White House?

You think maybe she’ll fly on her broom on Halloween night?

William JEFFERSON CLINTON——capitus diminutio Media

I’m female BTW

CHARGE(Check me out!)

William JEFFERSON CLINTON——capitus diminutio Media

I’m female BTW

_____________________-

I apologize Miss Lady

Redd

That’s okay. I’m willin’ to help a brotha out when he’s attemptin’ to educate.

@eddiedollars

Oh, that was from a Christian site? Now you know that is not a reliable source.

I was being facetious, but you seem to have many disparate theories, stories, terminologies swirling around. . .It’s hard to keep up.

Sydney

Oh, that was from a Christian site? Now you know that is not a reliable source.

_________________________________________________________________________

Why is that?

@SYDNEY… AND IT’S FUNNY HOW YOU LAUGH AT WITCHCRAFT… WHEN MADONNA TELLS YOU SHE IS PERFORMING KABBALISTIC RITUALS AND HAS BEEN SINCE THE 80′S… THEN EVERYBODY WONDERS WHY THE HELL JUSTIN IS POPPIN’ OUT JANETS TITTY… AND WHY THE HELL DOES SHE HAVE A SUN ORNAMENT ON HER NIPPLE… MAGIC… NOW I’M ABOUT TO DISAPPEAR FOR A MIN. HAHAHA…

@Charge

Like eddiedollars himself pointed out, you have to question the agenda of a source and I’m not sure I would count an organizational website as a valid source, particularly with such a controversial allegation.

@eddiedollars

What is the link for the Reagan info?

So there was something deeper going on with Nipplegate, too?

Before I leave for the day, may I ask if all of you plan to vote? Or is that just a dumb question, given the path of destiny and all. . .

Uh, Redd, I made the Palin comparison earlier. . .

@eddiedollars

May I have the link then for your info? The site name will be fine.

Sydney

My ancestors died fighting so that we could. Of course, I’m voting. A christian website isn’t a reliable source, but your copy & paste ones are?

@ SYDNEY… THE REGAN STUFF WAS FROM VATICANASSASINS… JUST GOOGLE REGAN ILLUMINATI…

THIS IS FROM THE FREEMAN PERSPECTIVE… Top CBS executives approved a musical skit where Janet Jackson would expose her breast during the MTV-produced Super Bowl half-time concert, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. “The decision to go forward went to the very top of the network,” a well-placed source explained from New York. The groundbreaking scene came during the most-watched television broadcast of the year. During half-time at the 2004 Superbowl, Janet Jackson exposed her nipple ring adorned breast with Justin Timberlake. The nipple ring was a sun, made of gold. This is the ancient symbols of the goddess and god. Venus and Mars, Ishtar and Marduk, Inanna and Utu, whichever you choose to call them, the attributes are the same. You will find the goddess bearing her breast, as in Lady Liberty, and the male is worshiped as the Sun and gold is his metal, while silver is the metal of the goddess and she is worshipped as the moon.

SERIOUSLY JUST UTUBE ILLUMINATI CORPORATE LOGOS…

@Charge

I usually post the site name for the source of all my news posts, which are primarily mainstream sources. The last post on the Obama news buy is posted on the Wall Street Journal site, www(dot)wsj(dot)com, along with the New York Times, www(dot)nytimes(dot)com, and Pollster(dot)com.

Now I will have to look up this “Vaticanassassins” site. . .

The nipple ring was a sun, made of gold. This is the ancient symbols of the goddess and god.

_________________________________________________________________________

Very true

Just like the wearing of the a wedding ring symbolizes the ring of Saturn.

OK, according to this Vaticanassassins site, a group I’ve never heard of was responsible for 9/11:

“Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, the General of the International Military Order of the Society of Jesus, commonly known as “the Black Pope”, ordered the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on Tuesday, September 11, 2001, with the advice and consent of his General Staff, composed of five assistants (each representing a hemisphere and under whom are many advisory Provincials), an advisor (resembling the likes of a military commander to warn him of any faults or mistakes), and his confessor (to ease his conscience and absolve him of his many sins).”

@SYDNEY… WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT I POSTED…?

DON’T TRY AND DISPROVE THE WEBSITE… DISPROVE MY CLAIMS…

@eddiedollars

You told me that site was the source of your info on Reagan, right? Well, this is some of the info I found posted there. I do have the right link, don’t I?

Sydney(Check me out!)

Uh, Redd, I made the Palin comparison earlier. . .

_______________-

Oh..lol…I didnt even see that comment..but the way you said it was different..I aint tripping on you lady..I know me and you agree to disagree…

@eddiedollars

I’m not trying to disprove anything. . .I’m trying desperately to understand, and I don’t.

Have a good night.

@Sydney

Truff made one too…I disapprove of his

Oh, OK, Redd. You have a good night, too.

Sydney

You should research the illuminati before you claim to not believe in it. What do you believe in? Are you Muslim, Atheist, Christian?

eddiedollars215(Check me out!)

@ SYDNEY… THE REGAN STUFF WAS FROM VATICANASSASINS… JUST GOOGLE REGAN ILLUMINATI…

SERIOUSLY JUST UTUBE ILLUMINATI CORPORATE LOGOS…

_________________________

I dont think Sydney approves of using YouTube as a valid source…lol

Aight people Im out

@Charge

I would like to hear you thoughts on things next time, if thats ok with you…

Redd

That’s cool bruh.. Sydney claims her sources are mainstream, but she don’t understand that government officials, royal families, owners of companies like News Corporation, GE, Viacom, have private meetings behind closed doors, and they control all the media-what’s in the newspaper, TV, magazines.

@Charge

I was raised in a Christian household. And I don’t believe in conspiracy theories, so I don’t think I can add much to this conversations.

*these conversations*

@ SYDNEY

HEY YOU! I DON’T SEE HOW YOU DO IT!!! LOL!!!

LOL, Truff, this is it for me. . .I gave it the old college try and tried to broaden my horizons, but it’s beyond me. . .I’ll stick with the tainted mainstream media, lol.

Sydney

You don’t believe in conspiracies

Look at the one dollar bill. They are meanings on the front and back. Nuvus Ordo Seclorum= New Wold Order. annuit coeptis=our enterprise is now a success, pyramid=god’s sun. 13 masonic symbolism-13 stripes/13 stars/13 leaves/13 arrows. Owl on the front of the dollar bill=bohemian society in L.A., presidents wearing KKK attire, and meet at night. The owl means that they are wise and see things in the dark that you don’t. The eye on the dollar bill=eye on CBS symbol

Columbia pictures, columbia univeristy, district of columbia=columbian faction basis of illuminati. District of Columbia means they own the government, which means they own you.

Most people think that 1776 was when the country was founded, WRONG, that’s when the secret society formed itself.

Check into it, and if you still don’t believe, then fine, but at least you will know.

SYDNEY YOU AIN’T LIED ON THAT ONE!!!!!!!! LOL!!!

WITH ALL THE DOUBLE SPEAK, SUBTERFUGE, AND DIVERSIONS……….

I FEEL LIKE I’VE BEEN TO A MICHAEL MOORE, OLIVER STONE, DAVID COPPERFIELD, AND PENN & TELLER PRODUCTION!!!

<<—looks dreamily at Obama wishing so many more black men would follow his lead so black women would have some real choices out there!

if you’re African American and your lips turn darker from smoking…….something isn’t right and you should quit.

I hope Obama kicks his habit.

I see a lot of us who obviously smoke, because of the unusually dark lips. That ain’t natural, if you take a look at the last couple of prior generations.

Something ain’t right…….never seen so many lips practically black from smoking!

sOMEONE tELL tHAT cORNY bLACK cONSERVATIVE wE all lOVE & sUPPORT oBAMA aROUND hERE. pERIOD.