“After Earth” bombed at the box office, but we knew that was gonna happen right?
There’s another way to look at the disappointing $27 million that “After Earth” earned during its opening weekend: What would this film have grossed without Will Smith on the poster?
From the seeming last-minute press push (the high profile New York magazine cover story featuring Smith and his son and co-star Jaden didn’t hit newsstands until five days before the film’s release) to the late-stage release date change (six weeks ago, Sony moved “After Earth” from the more-competitive June 7 slot to May 31), “After Earth” has had the stench of a film that even the studio knew was bad. Here, by the way, is how Sony framed the “After Earth” debut in a press release about the opening on Sunday: “While we were expecting more domestically, we believe the film will perform strongly when we open overseas over the next few weeks.”
It would be easy to write something snarky here about also believing in unicorns or Xenu, but Sony is probably right: Smith is a global box office star, and even past stumbles, like last year’s “Men in Black 3,” earned significantly more overseas than here in North America.
“Men in Black 3,” it should be noted, is where the seeds for the disastrous “After Earth” opening were sewn. Despite the added benefit of 3D surcharges, that film earned just $179 million last summer, or $11 million less than “Men In Black 2″ made 10 years prior. Adjust for inflation, however, and that gap explodes: “Men In Black 2″ would have grossed $240 million in 2012 money. “Men In Black 3″ was a hit because of the $445 million in international ticket sales, nearly double what its predecessor made. It goes to reason that “After Earth” could follow a similar trajectory, albeit with lower results across the board. (This thing will be lucky to do “Battleship” numbers in North America.)
Those troubling trends aside, Smith is a global star and will remain a global star until he can’t open a movie as bad as “After Earth.” The problem, however, is this: “After Earth” has become Smith’s Oprah couch-jump. “Yeah, I’m very, very serious about systems supporting creative inspiration,” Smith told New York when asked about the rumor that he alphabetized the family’s laser disc collection.
It didn’t have to be this way. As Grantland writer Alex Pappademas noted, Smith turned down what he felt was a supporting role in “Django Unchained” … for what is a supporting role in “After Earth.” Jaden’s the lead here, something even director M. Night Shyamalan admitted was embedded in the film’s marketing campaign. “I put Jaden just a bit ahead of Will [on the poster],” Shyamalan told Moviefone. “So you’re getting that orientation that the movie is a kind of passing of the torch.”
There’s something admirable about Smith’s desire to pass the torch of stardom to his 14-year-old son. Except audiences aren’t embracing Jaden in the same way they did with Will. Young Will Smith — the swaggering Fresh Prince, the guy who makes this look good — was an overconfident underdog with parents who just didn’t understand; Jaden’s parents wanted to give him a blockbuster.
Jaden as the new Fresh Prince? Will picking terrible roles? Let’s keep it 100, his movies have been terrible for the last 3-4 years. We might have to start buying the bootleg versions of his flicks from now own.
Image via Facebook