Question Of The Day: Is Humpback Hov A “Poor Excuse For A Husband” For Relishing In Bey’s Sexed-Up Grammy Performance?

- By Bossip Staff

Is the hottest chick in the game WEARING the chain, or ON the chain?

We came across this article in the NYPost where writer Naomi Schaeffer Riley suggests that Camel Carter is an ain’t isht husband for essentially treating his better half, Beyoncé, like a glorified ho.


What do you call a man who stands there smiling and singing as his scantily clad wife straddles a chair and shakes her rear end for other men’s titillation?

I’m certain if I look through enough Jay Z song titles, I’ll come up with the right name for his role in Beyoncé’s performance at the Grammy Awards Sunday night. Rhymes with Goodyear. . . ? Well, how about I just call him a poor excuse for a husband.

For years, these award ceremonies have pushed the envelope; Beyoncé’s booty-shaking was certainly no worse than Miley Cyrus’s twerking or any number of other performances by Madonna, for instance. But there’s something particularly icky about doing it while your husband looks on approvingly.

“Honestly, I didn’t want to watch Jay Z and Beyoncé’s foreplay,” says Charlotte Hays, author of “When Did White Trash Become the New Normal?” Indeed, the happy couple seems to have completely blurred the line between what goes on in their bedroom and what happens on national TV. So much for the woman that Michelle Obama has called “a role model who kids everywhere can look up to.”

Hays says, “It wasn’t surprising to see Jay Z, looking pleased at his wife’s hyper-sexualized exhibition on stage.” After all, “he’s made a living singing lyrics that call women ‘bitches’ and ‘hos,’ so we shouldn’t be surprised that he objectified his own wife on stage.”

Not only does Naomi think Jay is pathetic, she believes Beyawnsay is a hypocrite…

It is a little bit surprising, though, coming so soon after Beyoncé contributed to the recent feminist manifesto, the Shriver Report. When she complains that “gender equality is a myth,” one wonders to what extent her consent to sell sexuality has contributed to the problem.

The sophisticates will say that what we saw Sunday were just the long-established stage personas of Beyoncé and Jay Z; why should their marriage change that?

Well, for one thing, the happy couple have invited audiences to admire their adorable family, with dad even joking about his daughter’s sippy cups when he accepted an award on Sunday. So they’re suggesting to audiences that this kind of public sexual behavior is compatible with a loving modern marriage.

To the Camel’s credit, “Drunk In Love” is HER song, not his. Furthermore she’s singing about pleasing him, so, yeah, he’s probably going to enjoy it.

What do you think? Does Naomi have a valid point or is she just a bitter feminist hive hater?

Image via WENN

More Stories From Bossip


blog comments powered by Disqus